State Reply to Motion in Limine 11

Close

Court Filing

PDF State Reply to Motion in Limine 11Exclude IGG Evidence
court Court Filing Idaho 4

Named in this document

  • Bryan Kohberger Person
  • Ashley Jennings Person
  • Jennifer Keyes Person
  • Will Adams Person
Electronically Filed
3/21/2025 4:29 PM

Fourth Judicial District, Ada County Trent Tripple, Clerk of the Court
By: Jennifer Keyes, Deputy Clerk
LATAH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, JR., ISB No. 2613
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

ASHLEY S. JENNINGS, ISB No. 8491
SENIOR DEPUTY PROSECUTOR

Latah County Courthouse 522 S. Adams Street, Ste. 211 Moscow, ID 83843
Phone: (208) 883-2246 paservice@latahcountyid.gov
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE
STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA

STATE OF IDAHO, Case No. CR01-24-31665 Plaintiff,
STATE'S REPLY TO

V. DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO

STATE'S OPPOSITION TO

BRYAN C. KOHBERGER, MOTION IN LIMINE 11 RE:

Defendant. EXCLUDE IGG EVIDENCE COMES NOW the State of Idaho, by and through the Latah County Prosecuting Attorney, and submits the following reply to the March 17, 2025 “ Defendant's Reply to State's Opposition [sic] to Motion in Limine 11 RE: Exclude IGG Evidence. ” The State will be meeting with its prosecution and investigation team to identify who will testify about the receipt of a " tip ” on or about December 19, 2022, and the subsequent actions taken by investigators and the State, and advise Court and Counsel.

It is unclear what the Defendant means in the last sentence of his reply: “ since this STATE'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO STATE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE 11 RE:
EXCLUDE IGG EVIDENCE 1

testimony will be sanitized for presentation to the jury to avoid the IGG process, it must also not falsely suggest that there was any other evidence or tip that led the State to Mr. Kohberger. ” There is substantial evidence (gathered both prior to the " tip " and subsequently) leading to Mr.

Kohberger being the person responsible for the November 13, 2022, homicides and burglary.

The State will certainly not “ falsely ” produce or refer to this other evidence but will rely on all of this evidence at trial to establish the Defendant's guilt.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 21st day of March 2025.

William W. Thompson, Jr.

Prosecuting Attorney STATE'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO STATE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE 11 RE:
EXCLUDE IGG EVIDENCE 2

CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY

I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the STATE'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
REPLY TO STATE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE 11 RE: EXCLUDE IGG
EVIDENCE were served on the following in the manner indicated below:
Anne Taylor Mailed Attorney at Law E-filed & Served / E-mailed PO Box 2347 Faxed Coeur D Alene, ID 83816 Hand Delivered Dated this 21st day of March 2025.

STATE'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO STATE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE 11 RE:
EXCLUDE IGG EVIDENCE 3