Reply to Objection Motion to Suppress 119 Lamsden

Close

Court Filing

PDF Reply to Objection Motion to Suppress 119 LamsdenPennsylvania Search Warrant
court Court Filing Idaho 4

Named in this document

  • Bryan Kohberger Person
  • Jay Logsdon Person
  • Elsa G. Massoth Person
  • Jay Lessder Person
  • Jennifer Keyes Person
  • Mr. Nye Person
Electronically Filed
12/19/2024 5:54 PM

Fourth Judicial District, Ada County Trent Tripple, Clerk of the Court
By: Jennifer Keyes, Deputy Clerk Anne Taylor Law, PLLC Anne C. Taylor, Attorney at Law PO Box 2347 Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816
Phone: (208) 512-9611 iCourt Email: info@annetaylorlaw.com Jay W. Logsdon, First District Public Defender Idaho State Public Defender 1450 Northwest Blvd.

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814
Phone: (208) 605-4575 Elisa G. Massoth, PLLC Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1003 Payette, Idaho 83661
Phone: (208) 642-3797; Fax: (208)642-3799 Assigned Attorney:
Anne C. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Bar Number: 5836 Jay W. Logsdon, First District Public Defender, Bar Number: 8759 Elisa G. Massoth, Attorney at Law, Bar Number: 5647
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE
STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA

STATE OF IDAHO, CASE NUMBER CR01-24-31665

Plaintiff,
REPLY TO STATE'S OBJECTION ΤΟ

V. DEFENDANT'S MOTION ΤΟ

SUPPRESS AND MEMORANDUM IN

BRYAN C. KOHBERGER, SUPPORT

Defendant. RE: PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH
WARRANT FOR 119 LAMSDEN DR.,

ALBRIGHTSVILLE, PA

COMES NOW, Bryan C. Kohberger, by and through his attorneys of record, and respectfully submits the following Reply to the State's objection to his “ Motion to Suppress and
Memorandum in Support RE: Pennsylvania Search Warrant for 119 Lamsden Dr., Albrightsville, PA and Statements Made. "
REPLY TO STATE'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT RE: PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH WARRANT

FOR 119 LAMSDEN DR., ALBRIGHTSVILLE, PA Page 1

First, it appears that the parties are in agreement on much of what law applies to the search of home. Several topics Mr. Kohberger addresses are more fully developed elsewhere and his replies to those will be filed in his other replies, i.e., Franks, IGG, Apple, Amazon, and AT & T Records.

That leaves the issue of how Federal and Pennsylvanian Law Enforcement conducted their raid. The State tries to draw out its fact section by restating things several ways on pages 6 and 7 of its objection, but it basically just boils down to “ we knew he was in there and owned a gun ”, which of course is true of most Americans. The State cites to not a single case similar to the facts here.

Instead, the State relies on a memorandum written by Police Sgt. Lang of the Pennsylvania State Police apparently to justify their actions. This odd document, never before disclosed, appears to have been written in response to Mr. Kohberger's briefing, and includes no date. Basically, the police tell us they had to destroy the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr.

Kohberger's rubber gloves. No legal authority is provided.

However, given that this statement now exists, the Court can compare this scenario with any number of cases. Just a couple of examples:
• U.S. v. Gaither, 871 F.Supp. 5, 6-7 (D.D.C. 1994): Forcible entry upheld where police loudly announced but could hear “ sounds consistent with a constructive refusal ", and the subject was suspected of murder and believed well-armed.

• Kornegay v. Cottingham, 120 F.3d 392, 398-400 (3rd Cir. 1997): No knock entry found unjustified where suspect was suspected of murder, the murder weapon, a handgun, was missing, and he had a history of drug dealing and violent crimes.

REPLY TO STATE'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT RE: PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH WARRANT

FOR 119 LAMSDEN DR., ALBRIGHTSVILLE, PA Page 2

Here, the police were concerned about making a “ hasty ” knock and announce, which apparently meant no knock and yelling from their bearcat, because Mr. Kohberger was wearing the same gloves millions of homeowners wear to do the dishes.

Two more things of note: According to the police, they had snipers watching Mr. Kohberger go from room to room, obviously greatly reducing his chances of posing much of a threat. And, although the State oddly claims it is not true, the FBI had been surveilling Mr. Kohberger since December 21 and had many occasions to take him into custody. The State had identified Mr.

Kohberger on December 19, 2022 through Investigative Genetic Genealogy, the State had obtained aerial photographs of the Kohberger residence on December 21, 2022, the State had driven by the Kohberger residence on December 23, 2022 and followed Mr. Kohberger on December 24, 2022.

Cameras were placed on his parents ' property on December 25, 2022 and trash was taken from the property on December 27, 2022.

The State seems to accept that a failure to abide by law as to knocking and announcing leads to the exclusion of what was found in Mr. Kohberger's parents ' home. This Court must suppress this evidence.

DATED this 19 day of December 2024.

Jay Lessder
BY:

JAY WESTON LOGSDON

FIRST DISTRICT PUBLIC DEFENDER

REPLY TO STATE'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT RE: PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH WARRANT

FOR 119 LAMSDEN DR., ALBRIGHTSVILLE, PA Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was personally served as indicated below on the 19 day of December, 2024 addressed to:
Latah County Prosecuting Attorney -via Email: paservice@latahcountyid.gov
Elisa Massoth-via Email: legalassistant@kmrs.net Jay Logsdon – via Email: Jay.Logsdon@spd.idaho.gov Jeffery Nye, Deputy Attorney General – via Email: Jeff.nye@ag.idaho.gov Dul
REPLY TO STATE'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT RE: PENNSYLVANIA SEARCH WARRANT

FOR 119 LAMSDEN DR., ALBRIGHTSVILLE, PA Page 4