Court Filing
Filed: 05/28/2025 08:13:19 Fourth Judicial District, Ada County Trent Tripple, Clerk of the Court By: Deputy Clerk-Waters, Renee LATAH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, JR., ISB No. 2613 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY ASHLEY S. JENNINGS, ISB No. 8491 SENIOR DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JOSHUA D. HURWIT, ISB. No. 9527 SPECIAL DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Latah County Courthouse 522 S. Adams Street, Ste. 211 Moscow, ID 83843 Phone: (208) 883-2246 paservice@latahcountyid.gov IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA STATE OF IDAHO, Case No. CR01-24-31665 Plaintiff, STATE'S PROPOSED V. SUPPLEMENTAL JURY INSTRUCTION BRYAN C. KOHBERGER, Defendant. COME NOW the State of Idaho, by and through the Latah County Prosecuting, and pursuant to the Court's directive contained in the first full paragraph of page 13 of the April 17, 2025, " Order on Defendant's Motion in Limine RE: Rylene Nowlin and ' touch ' and ' contact ' DNA, " the State respectfully submits the attached draft jury instruction to be used in the event the terms " touch DNA, " " contact DNA, " and " trace DNA, " are inadvertently used during trial. The State acknowledges that the Court's request was to submit " a mutually STATE'S PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL JURY INSTRUCTION 1 agreeable instruction.... ” However, the parties have been unable to reach agreement so the State is submitting its draft for the Court's consideration. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 28th day of May 2025. William W. Thompson, Jr. Prosecuting Attorney STATE'S PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL JURY INSTRUCTION 2 CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the STATE'S PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL JURY INSTRUCTION were served on the following in the manner indicated below: Anne Taylor Mailed Attorney at Law E-filed & Served / E-mailed PO Box 2347 Faxed Coeur D Alene, ID 83816 info@annetaylorlaw.com Hand Delivered Dated this 28th day of May 2025. S STATE'S PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL JURY INSTRUCTION 3 STATE'S REQUESTED INSTRUCTION NO. The Court has asked that witnesses refrain from using the terms “ touch DNA ”, “ contact DNA ” and “ trace DNA. ” To the extent that those terms may have been mentioned by a witness, you are to disregard that particular term and not give it significance as you consider the evidence or testimony related to the use of the term. ICJI 308 EVIDENCE LIMITED AS TO PURPOSE (modified) GIVEN REFUSED MODIFIED COVERED OTHER