Document
IDAHO POLICE STATE IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES 700 South Stratford Drive, Ste 125 Meridian, ID 83642-6202 Phone: (208) 884-7170 Fax: (208) 884-7197 FORENSIC LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION REPORT Case Agency (s): Agency Case No (s).: Laboratory Case No.: MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22-M09903 M2022-4843 Date (s) of Offense: Investigating Officer (s): Report No.: 11/13/2022 Dustin Blaker 32 Date Evidence Accepted: Analyst: 04/14/2023 Tara Martinez Case Name (s): Suspect - ██████████████████████████ BRYAN KOHBERGER Victim - ██████████████████████ MADISON M MOGEN Victim-XANA A KERNODLE Victim-ETHAN J CHAPIN Victim-KAYLEE J GONCALVES EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION: Item 128 (Agency Exh. 23M-0501): three sets of exemplars bearing the name ███████████████████ (128.1-128.3). Item 129 (Agency Exh. 23M-0502): three sets of exemplars bearing the name ███████████████ (129.1- 129.3). CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Latent prints were previously examined for comparable ridge detail. Latent prints L5 and L6 are of value for comparison. Latent print L6 is not suitable for Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System (MBIS) inquiry. Latent print L5 was previously searched through MBIS. Latent prints of █████████████████████████████████████ value were analyzed and compared to the known exemplars bearing the names ████████ Page 1 of 2 Laboratory Case Number: M2022-4843 Report No.: 32 COMPARISON RESULTS: Latent Print ██████████████████ █████████████████ L5 INCE Excluded L6 INCE INCL INCE in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the known exemplars and / or incomplete known exemplars with which to compare. In order to complete the comparison portion of this ██████████ examination, it is requested that a quality set of fully rolled fingerprints be submitted for ████████ INCL in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the latent print. Excluded in the table above indicates that the latent print is excluded to the exemplars used. Additional exemplars are requested of ████████████████████████████████ and any other persons that were present in the residence on 11/13/22. DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE: Latent prints were previously marked and preserved. Digital images used for analysis and / or comparison are being retained by ISP Forensic Services. Items 128 and 129 will be returned to the submitting agency. REMARKS: The descriptions, conclusions and interpretations stated above apply to the sample (s) as received. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct. Tara ██████████████████████████████ Martinez / Forensic Scientist Issue Date: 04/18/2023 Page 2 of 2