Latent Print Exam Report 141

Close

Document

PDF Latent Print Exam Report 141Latent Print Examination
agency_release Document Idaho 4

Named in this document

  • Tara Martinez Person
  • 1122 King Rd Location
  • Bryan Kohberger Person
  • Dustin Blaker Person
  • Ethan Chapin Person
  • Kaylee Goncalves Person
  • Moscow, ID Location
IDAHO

POLICE

STATE

IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES

700 South Stratford Drive, Ste 125 Meridian, ID 83642-6202
Phone: (208) 884-7170
Fax: (208) 884-7197
FORENSIC LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION REPORT

Case Agency (s): Agency Case No (s).: Laboratory Case No.:
MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22-M09903 M2022-4843

Date (s) of Offense: Investigating Officer (s): Report No.:
11/13/2022 Dustin Blaker 40
Date Evidence Accepted: Analyst:
06/21/2024 Tara Martinez Case Name (s):
Suspect - ██████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ BRYAN KOHBERGER Victim - ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ MADISON M MOGEN Victim-XANA A KERNODLE Victim-ETHAN J CHAPIN Victim-KAYLEE J GONCALVES
EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION:

Latent prints L5 and L6 were previously captured digitally at 1122 King Rd. Moscow, Idaho.

Item 136 (Agency Exh. 136): three exemplars bearing the name ██████████████ (136.1-136.3).

CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS:

Latent prints were previously examined for comparable ridge detail.

Latent prints L5 and L6 are of value for comparison.

Latent print L5 is of value for Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System (MBIS) inquiry and was previously searched through MBIS.

Latent print L6 is not suitable for MBIS inquiry.

█████████ Latent prints of value were analyzed and compared to the known exemplars bearing the name ████████
Page 1 of 2

Laboratory Case Number: M2022-4843 Report No.: 40
COMPARISON RESULTS:

Latent Print ████████████████████
L5 Excluded
L6 INCL

Excluded in the table above indicates that the latent print is excluded to the exemplars used.

INCL in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the latent print.

DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE:

Latent prints were previously marked and preserved. Digital images used for analysis and / or comparison are being retained by Idaho State Police Forensic Services and are available upon request.

Item 136 will be returned to the submitting agency.

REMARKS:

The descriptions, conclusions and interpretations stated above apply to the sample (s) as received.

I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct.

Tara ████████████████████ Martinez / Forensic Scientist
Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Page 2 of 2