Document
IDAHO POLICE STATE IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES 700 South Stratford Drive, Ste 125 Meridian, ID 83642-6202 Phone: (208) 884-7170 Fax: (208) 884-7197 FORENSIC LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION REPORT Case Agency (s): Agency Case No (s).: Laboratory Case No.: MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22-M09903 M2022-4843 Date (s) of Offense: Investigating Officer (s): Report No.: 11/13/2022 Dustin Blaker 41 Date Evidence Accepted: Analyst: 09/11/2024 Tara Martinez Case Name (s): Suspect - ██████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ BRYAN KOHBERGER Victim - ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ MADISON M MOGEN Victim-XANA A KERNODLE Victim-ETHAN J CHAPIN Victim-KAYLEE J GONCALVES EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION: Latent prints L5 and L6 were previously captured digitally at 1122 King Rd. Moscow, Idaho. Item 137 (Agency Exh. 24M-1284): two fingerprint cards bearing the name ███████████████████ (137.1, 137.2). Item 138 (Agency Exh. 24M-1332): three fingerprint cards bearing the name ███████████████████ (138.1-138.3). CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Latent prints were previously examined for comparable ridge detail. Latent prints L5 and L6 are of value for comparison. Latent print L5 is of value for Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System (MBIS) inquiry and was previously searched through MBIS. Latent print L6 is not suitable for MBIS inquiry. Page 1 of 2 Laboratory Case Number: M2022-4843 Report No.: 41 Latent █████████████ prints of value were analyzed and compared to the known exemplars bearing the name █████████ COMPARISON RESULTS: Latent Print ██████████████████ L5 Excluded L6 INCL INCL in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the latent print. Excluded in the table above indicates that the latent print is excluded to the exemplars used. If an additional suspect is developed by your agency at a later date, a fingerprint card or the appropriate suspect information should be submitted for comparison. DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE: Latent prints were marked and preserved. Digital images used for analysis and / or comparison are being retained by Idaho State Police Forensic Services and are available upon request. Items 137 and 138 will be returned to the submitting agency. REMARKS: The descriptions, conclusions and interpretations stated above apply to the sample (s) as received. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct. Tara █████████████████████ Martinez / Forensic Scientist Issue Date: 09/24/2024 Page 2 of 2