Document
IDAHO POLICE STATE IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES 700 South Stratford Drive, Ste 125 Meridian, ID 83642-6202 Phone: (208) 884-7170 Fax: (208) 884-7197 FORENSIC LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION REPORT Case Agency (s): Agency Case No (s).: Laboratory Case No.: MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22-M09903 M2022-4843 Date (s) of Offense: Investigating Officer (s): Report No.: 11/13/2022 Dustin Blaker 5 Date Evidence Accepted: Analyst: 11/18/2022, 11/21/2022 Tara Martinez Case Name (s): Suspect - ████████████████ Subject █████████████████ Subject █████████████████████ Victim-MADISON M MOGEN Victim-XANA A KERNODLE Victim-ETHAN J CHAPIN Victim-KAYLEE J GONCALVES EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION: Item 21: Digital images for comparison captured at 1122 King Rd. Moscow, Idaho Item 25 (Agency Exh. 22M-1909): four exemplars bearing the name Ethan J. Chapin (25.1-25.4). Item 26 (Agency Exh. 22M-1950): four exemplars bearing the name Xana Kernodle (26.1-26.4). Item 27 (Agency Exh. 22M-1987): four exemplars bearing the name Madison Mogen (27.1-27.4). Item 28 (Agency Exh. 22M-2024): four exemplars bearing the name Kaylee Goncalve (28.1-28.4). CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: One latent print was examined for comparable ridge detail. Latent print L5 is of value for comparison. Latent print L5 is of value for Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System (MBIS) inquiry. Latent prints of value were analyzed and compared to the known exemplars bearing the names MADISON MOGEN, KAYLEE GONCALVE, XANA KERNODLE and ETHAN J CHAPIN. Latent print L5 was entered and searched through MBIS where no likely candidates were generated. Page 1 of 2 Laboratory Case Number: M2022-4843 Report No.: 5 COMPARISON RESULTS: Latent Print MADISON ΧΑΝΑ ETHAN KAYLEE MOGEN KERNODLE CHAPIN GONCALVES L5 Excluded INCE INCE Excluded INCE in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the known exemplars. Excluded in the table above indicates that the latent print is excluded to the exemplars used. No fingerprints were found to be on file for ████████████████████████████████████████ In order to complete the comparison portion of this examination, it is requested that a quality set of fingerprints be submitted. If a suspect is developed by your agency at a later date, a fingerprint card or the appropriate suspect information should be submitted for comparison. There are three remaining latent prints captured from 1122 King Rd. (L1, L2 and L6); additional report to follow. DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE: Latent prints were marked and preserved. Digital images used for analysis and / or comparison are being retained by ISP Forensic Services. Items 25-28 are being retained in the laboratory, pending further comparisons. Digital evidence will not be returned to the submitting agency. REMARKS: The descriptions, conclusions and interpretations stated above apply to the sample (s) as received. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct. Tara ███████████████████████ Martinez / Forensic Scientist Issue Date: 11/28/2022 Page 2 of 2