Document
IDAHO POLICE STATE IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES 700 South Stratford Drive, Ste 125 Meridian, ID 83642-6202 Phone: (208) 884-7170 Fax: (208) 884-7197 FORENSIC LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION REPORT Case Agency (s): Agency Case No (s).: Laboratory Case No.: MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT 22-M09903 M2022-4843 Date (s) of Offense: Investigating Officer (s): Report No.: 11/13/2022 Dustin Blaker 30 Date Evidence Accepted: Analyst: 12/05/2022 Tara Martinez Case Name (s): Suspect-BRYAN KOHBERGER Victim-MADISON M MOGEN Victim-XANA A KERNODLE Victim-ETHAN J CHAPIN Victim-KAYLEE J GONCALVES EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION: Latent prints L35.1 and L35.2 were observed and preserved during the processing of the scene at, 1122 King Rd, Moscow ID. CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Latent prints were examined for comparable ridge detail. Latent print L35.2 is of value for comparison but is not suitable for Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System (MBIS) inquiry. Latent print L35.1 does not contain a sufficient amount of clear ridge detail necessary for comparison. Latent print L35.2 was analyzed and compared to the known exemplars bearing the names XANA KERNODLE and BRYAN KOHBERGER. COMPARISON RESULTS: Latent Print XANA KERNODLE BRYAN KOHBERGER L35.2 INCM INCM Page 1 of 2 Laboratory Case Number: M2022-4843 Report No.: 30 INCM in the table above indicates that the comparison is inconclusive to the available exemplars. The inconclusive result is due to a lack of quantity / quality of detail in the known exemplars and / or incomplete known exemplars with which to compare. In order to complete the comparison portion of this examination, it is requested that a quality set of complete friction ridge exemplars, i.e. friction ridge skin not typically recorded on a ten-print card (complete foot exemplars), be submitted for XAΝΑ KERNODLE and BRYAN KOHBERGER. If an additional suspect is developed by your agency at a later date, palm print and foot exemplars or the appropriate suspect information should be submitted for comparison. Latent print comparisons were limited in this case, due to crime scene circumstances. If further comparisons are needed, please contact the laboratory. DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE: Latent prints were marked and preserved. Digital images used for analysis and / or comparison are being retained by ISP Forensic Services. Digital evidence will not be returned to the submitting agency. REMARKS: The descriptions, conclusions and interpretations stated above apply to the sample (s) as received. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct. Tara █████████████████████ Martinez / Forensic Scientist Issue Date: 04/18/2023 Page 2 of 2